Hello Guest
Click here to register in a few simple steps to enjoy all features of our Crackingforum. Using fake emails for registration will lead to a permanent ban.

Crackingforum - Best Cracking Forum - Cracking Soul



Poll: OnlyFans - Welcomed addition or cash grab scheme?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Good, I like it
0%
0 0%
Bad , I don't like it
100.00%
7 100.00%
Total 7 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Share Thread:

KinkyTown[Porn Discussion] OnlyFans - Welcomed addition or cash grab scheme?

Subscribe to this thread
#1
 
I don't like onlyfans, with prices starting at like $5-$19.90 for various stars, its a straight up cash grab for mediocre content. Theres rarely any content where a star finishes or provides a scene more than 10minutes long. Even people who have a problem with premature ejaculation would not be able to finish with the 59 second clips there. The cherry on top of the cake is that the onlyfans clips are sometimes just outtakes or B-roll footage from the full length scenes that are free on PornHub. What do you guys think about this?
Reply
[-] The following 6 users say Thank You to KinkyTown for this post:
  • DA, giaderzass, hellintime, shenmue, TheDarkness00, wormtail39
#2
There are two things I found worth money. Live chat on cam and/or custom made video per your requirement.

Everything else is questionable if it is worth or not. Yet, beauty is in the eye of the observer so if someone is willing to pay for cash grab scheme than I guess it's ok for him.
Please read forum rules carefully before making your first posts.
Reply
[-] The following 1 user says Thank You to Mr. James Bond for this post:
  • hssc11045
#3
Happy for the women to make some money but i am not a fan, i want these women in hardcore scenes and stuff like this means they don't have to, sounds selfish and i really do want the performers to be happy but i want porn scenes, not 5 min iphone clips of them fingering themselves or giving their boyfriendinfd a quick BJ/fuck.
Reply
[-] The following 2 users say Thank You to shenmue for this post:
  • hssc11045, rawbat
#4
Few girls subscription (9-12$) donot do explicit stuff in general but if they share and ask 5$ then I think it's somewhat fine. But if the subscription fee is 25$ and above that is just ridiculous. But onlyfans is still way better than patreon. Had horrible experiences in past. Totally overpriced.
Reply
#5
It wasnt to bad UNTIL these dumbass people on TikTok and Bella Thorne came out and starting saying "oh yea i make this much for showing my nips through a white shirt".. Only Fans is a joke now since its 50% nude and 50% non nude and you dont know until you pay for it.
Reply
[-] The following 4 users say Thank You to newaki for this post:
  • ciygvg, Mr. James Bond, shenmue, TheDarkness00
#6
When I first joined OF sites, I would start with free trials or severely discounted rates ($3-5/month). And this was before the likes of Bella Thorne and Tyga found OF.

Then, some stars might actually run their own sites. They would regularly have content on their page, do live shows, interact in message boards.

And then they became too popular. Too many subscribers. Then - what I call - the phone sex worker took over. Someone(s) posing as the star, posting the same pics repeatedly, short 5-20 sec recycled clips, PPV clips in messages of the same videos.

It's unfortunate but a reality of the situation: they are stars because everyone likes them and/or their work.

So while I may still frequent a handful of pages, it's still either free or nominal monthly rates. And I will spend when I want to spend, but very cautious about duplicating my purchases. Sometimes their OF is the only place to get content you'll never see anywhere else.
Reply
[-] The following 2 users say Thank You to TheDarkness00 for this post:
  • arisinclair, DA
#7
I am OK with the existence of OF, but I'm not a fan. I don't get off from pics, I don't get off from poorly shot POV 70 second clips. Maybe I'm just too used to my ways. 

Though I appreciate OF as a gateway for women and people to view sex work in a most positive light. Here in the US we have the absolute most backwards sex work views. Very far behind Europe and many many other countries in that regard.
Reply
#8
I agree that it's great that there are more avenues for adult-oriented content creators to promote themselves on, but OF is not my cup of tea. I get that it's supposed to be more "intimate", but I honestly find that most performers use it as an excuse to post low-effort content or be lazy, especially since most of the pics/vids are taken with their phones, and usually last less than a minute.

If OF was used to promote their content from other sources, like MFC/Chaturbate, ManyVids, PornHub, their own website, etc, then sure. But I find more and more creators are migrating over to OF, and purging all of their existing content on the other sites. Feels like they're kind of excluding a lot of people, and you can't get a preview/feel of their content for that reason.

Don't get me wrong, there are creators out there that make OF worth it, but I'd rather pay for single high-quality vids or photosets rather than subscribe to someone who regularly posts mediocre content; quality over quantity.

At the end of the day, though, seems like this is where the industry is gravitating towards to. I'd assume that OF's watermarking services and the ability to disallow subscribers from downloading directly within the platform is a plus in the eyes of the performers. And with PornHub's recent takedown of copyrighted material (amounting to 80% of the site), OF seems to be a platform to tackle many adversary models.
Reply
[-] The following 3 users say Thank You to arisinclair for this post:
  • DA, Mr. James Bond, TheDarkness00
#9
I find it a welcome addition to the sex world. There are so many gorgeous bitches on it that we might have never got to see naked had it not been for OF. Porn was getting a bit stale and this gave it the shake up it needed.
However, if the women are lazy and not doing all sorts of shit to keep their fans loyal, they won't have them for long and this is the beauty of choice. 
All in all, I think it's positive.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)